Qelv

Sources

Where every figure comes from.

A figure on this site is four things: the value, what it measures, the artifact it was read from, and the window it covers. Drop any one of the four and it is a claim, not a figure, and the build refuses to ship it. This page is the four things, explained.

Sourced figures
39

23 with a number, the rest qualitative, across 22 records

Kinds of source
6

each explained below

Screenshots and captures
13

7 of public sites, 6 of prototypes

Discovery notes
12

anonymized first moves that were written and sent

Kinds of source

Six kinds, from a dashboard export to a statement, ranked by what each can carry.

The label beside a figure names the artifact, never a quality: a dashboard export is not verified, it is a dashboard export. The weakest kind says so in its own name, and the register lets a reader filter it out.

  1. Dashboard export

    16 figures on the register

    What it is

    A figure read off a third-party dashboard export: Search Console, Analytics, a mail provider's deliverability report. The window it covers is printed beside it.

    What it can carry

    It measures what the dashboard measures, for the period shown, and nothing else. It is never a current or lifetime total, and it is never attributed to one piece of work without page-level evidence.

  2. Running system

    1 figure on the register

    What it is

    A system that was checked running: every route answering, a build audit passing on every deploy, a site serving.

    What it can carry

    It says the thing exists and works on the date checked. It says nothing about traffic or revenue unless a dashboard row says so separately.

  3. Engineering record

    11 figures on the register

    What it is

    Our own records of a build: a deployment log, a run summary, a repository's commit history, the schema and test suite as built.

    What it can carry

    It describes what was built and when. Counts of what the system processed for a client are published only where a run summary records them.

  4. Engagement record

    4 figures on the register

    What it is

    A contract, an invoice, a calendar of delivery sessions, or a client's own go-live notice.

    What it can carry

    It establishes that an engagement happened, its shape and its dates. Commercial terms stay off the page.

  5. Document on record

    4 figures on the register

    What it is

    A deliverable on file: a discovery and architecture document, a keyword-research file, an internal results report, a content brief.

    What it can carry

    It shows what was produced. Whether a client built or used what the document proposed is a separate claim, made only where a record supports it.

  6. Operator statement

    3 figures on the register

    What it is

    A figure the team operating a system states, with no export yet attached. Published with this label so a reader can filter it out.

    What it can carry

    It is the weakest kind here and it says so. When the logged window arrives, the kind changes; until then the record's withheld list names the gap.

The register

One list, every figure, with the record it belongs to.

The evidence register is the public counterpart of the internal ledger the founder keeps over the same records, restricted to what the register already publishes on a page. Weak rows stay in: a register where every property is a winner is a register nobody believes.

39

figures, filterable by practice, sector and kind

Open the register

14

records with a dated timeline from the ledger

Milestones as precise as the record allows and never more precise: a month where a month is known, a year where only the year is.

13

query rows transcribed from Search Console

The clean derivative of a dashboard crop, row by row with the exact window, which is what the ledger asks for instead of the crop.

Images

7 screenshots of public surfaces, framed with what they are.

Only a surface the public can visit is ever shown: a client's own site where linking is vetted, or our own. Never a dashboard crop, never an internal system, never a credential in frame. Every file was checked for embedded metadata before it was committed.

The 93 Brew homepage: a headline over a photograph of the counter, with opening hours and links to the menu and directions
Live site. Home: hours, the menu, and directions above the fold

A café website the owner can update without a developer

Owned venture · 7 pages in the gallery

The gallery, on the case page

Demos and captures

2 demos that run in your browser, 6 captures you can step through.

Prototypes are never linked at their preview address, because a preview with invented figures in it is exactly what gets screenshotted and passed off as a client dashboard. The demo is a page on this domain instead, and every figure on it says it is sample data.

Run it yourself

  • Automated order intake

    A fresh build of the one step worth arguing about, against invented data that lives in the page. Nothing leaves the tab.

  • Morning ads-ops agent

    A fresh build of the one step worth arguing about, against invented data that lives in the page. Nothing leaves the tab.

Step through the captures

Videos of a walkthrough are attached the same way as screenshots, through the register, and appear on a case page under supporting material the day one is added.

Discovery notes

12 first moves that were written and sent, anonymized.

The one-page note and the discovery work that follows a bottleneck, sampled from proposals that actually went out. No client or prospect is named, no price or hour count is repeated, and the outcome is stated as it was: most first moves end with no build, which is the point of a first move.

Between September 2025 and March 2026 we held about forty-five discovery calls, each used to define a practical first move.

  • Growth · 2025

    A marketing diagnostic for a home-services company and its franchise arm

    Proposal only. No build followed.

  • Growth · May 2026

    A channel viability study before any spend

    Study prepared; follow-up pending at the time of writing.

  • Growth · June 2026

    A ninety-day paid-search trial plan for a roof-restoration company

    Plan viewed and a brief received; the partner ran the account.

  • Automate · 2025

    Outreach, inbox, follow-up, voice, and billing, mapped as one system

    Proposal only. No signature, no build.

  • Automate · September 2025

    Billing reconciliation for a small clinical practice

    Proposal prepared; no award recorded.

  • Automate · March 2026

    Lead intake, qualification, follow-up, and booking, in two phases

    Proposed; no award.

  • Automate · November 2025

    Guest-service automation for a hospitality operator

    Proposed.

  • Automate · February to March 2026

    A spreadsheet-validation demo built before the proposal

    Demo and proposal; no award recorded.

  • Data · October 2025

    One place to read a restaurant's point of sale, social, and web analytics

    Discovery only. No build.

  • Data · October 2025 to January 2026

    Treasury forecast automation for a logistics group

    Discovery only. No build.

  • Build · October 2025 to February 2026

    A phased build for a remote-desktop platform, after a working proof of concept

    Unsigned. The proof of concept it followed is in the capability catalogue.

  • Build · September 2025

    A quote packet and a consolidated technical approach for a digital publication reader

    Proposal reviewed; no award. The discovery deliverable is on the work page.

Never published

What the site withholds, and why, in the same words the build enforces.

Each of these is a rule the build checks on every deploy or the ledger records against a specific record. None of them is a preference, and none of them bends for a good number.

A figure with no source and no period
Deck numbers, sales-call numbers and remembered numbers stay off the page. The build fails on a list of them by name.
A client's name without recorded permission
Naming, linking a client's site and showing the build are three separate permissions. Only the first two are ever granted, and each is recorded before it is used.
A dashboard crop that identifies an anonymized client
The figures are transcribed into a query table instead, row by row, with the exact window. That is the clean derivative the ledger asks for.
A link to a repository, a staging site or a client system
Restricted material states its reason and offers a walkthrough. The build fails on a repository or preview host anywhere in the export.
A client quote
Every quote in the ledger is marked as needing permission, and none is recorded. Outcomes that need no permission are published instead.
A prototype presented as delivered work
Every Labs entry carries its kind on the card, every figure inside one is sample data, and nothing in Labs is counted as work.

Seeing more

Everything restricted is shown on a call, not linked on a page.

Most of the work was delivered under confidentiality or under another firm’s brand. Our own engineering is screen-shared with anyone seriously evaluating us: the code, the architecture, the tests. Client systems are walked through with the client’s permission where it is needed. That is how the site stays free of anything it should not carry.

Ask for a walkthrough

Arranged within two business days. Nothing restricted is published to get there. The walkthrough is how it stays that way.

Where to next

Have a problem in this shape?

Send a short description. We will tell you whether to automate it, build around it, staff it, or leave it alone, and which of the records above it most resembles.

We reply within two business days. If it is a fit, you get a one-page note on what to do first, before any sales call.