Qelv

Founder-direct systems work

Most of what eats your week is software nobody has built yet.

We build software, data pipelines, and automations, and we put engineers on your team when you need hands. One person scopes the work, leads the build, and answers for it.

Or sort the bottleneck yourself first

Qelv LLC · US company · founder-direct delivery · work across the US, UK, Gulf, South Africa, and Pakistan

The main figures

projects delivered, counted once across three catalogues
86
Derived at build time: where 86 projects delivered, counted once across three catalogues comes from

Derived from the register, the catalogue and the portfolio at build time

Computed from the registers when the site was built, not typed by hand.

Check it
client engagements since summer 2023
43
Derived at build time: where 43 client engagements since summer 2023 comes from

Derived from the client records, owned ventures and internal products excluded

Computed from the registers when the site was built, not typed by hand.

Check it
countries delivered into
13
Engagement record: where 13 countries delivered into comes from

The evidence ledger, geographies across every record

From the contract or the engagement's paperwork.

Check it
months, the longest hourly retainer, March 2024 to May 2026
26
Engagement record: where 26 months, the longest hourly retainer, March 2024 to May 2026 comes from

Marketplace contract record

From the contract or the engagement's paperwork.

Check it
property audit briefed and delivered inside one business day
169 properties, same day
Engineering record: where 169 properties, same day property audit briefed and delivered inside one business day comes from

Delivery record, Qelv engineering record

Window 2026

From the build's own records: commits, logs, tickets.

Check it
qualified leads from our own outbound program
247
Document on record: where 247 qualified leads from our own outbound program comes from

Email outreach results report, Qelv internal record

Window July to October 2025

From a document held on file.

Check it

Start where you are

Tick what is eating your week.

It sorts into three piles: worth building, needs a person, and leave it alone. The third pile is the point. Nothing is sent until you send it.

Select the tasks taking up your team’s time

Your verdict appears here

Nothing selected yet. Pick as many as apply. Most companies tick three or four, and the sort says which of them is worth building first.

What we do

86 projects delivered across five practices.

ERP, CRM and POS platforms, treasury and payroll systems, voice agents and retrieval assistants, data pipelines, search programs and the engineers who staffed them. Pick the door that matches the problem.

A project that spans two practices is listed under both, so the rows add up to more than 86. Ecommerce and operations problems cut across all five: start from the problem and we route it.

Selected work

Systems that are running, with the source beside the number.

Search windows on record

Two growth engagements carry a Search Console export with its exact window. Listed as supporting evidence, not as the point: impressions are a measure of demand, not of the work.

  • 507K search impressions

    Click Computer. Recorded during an email and paid-media engagement.

    Google Search Console · May–September 2025

  • 6.37K clicks / 174K impressions

    Fish Frenzy.

    Google Search Console · 16 months from 20 June 2024

Every figure with its source, in one filterable list

How it goes

4 steps. Every one of them optional.

Nothing is bundled into a retainer. Each step is priced on its own, and most enquiries stop at the first one with a written answer.

  1. Free · None

    Step 1: Send the bottleneck

    Describe what is being copied, chased, rebuilt, or checked by hand. No call, no form maze.

    • A read from the person who would build it
    • A one-page first move if it is a fit
    • A straight “leave this alone” if it is not
  2. Free · None

    Step 2: Scoping call, only if you want one

    Thirty minutes to pressure-test the first move and agree what success is measured on.

    • The KPI the work will be judged on
    • A fixed price and a delivery window
    • What we are deliberately not doing
  3. From $1.5K · One build

    Step 3: Fixed-price build

    The smallest useful system, shipped. Price agreed before work starts and it does not move.

    • A working system in your accounts and repository
    • Handover documentation
    • The measure from step 2, reported against
  4. Optional monthly · Cancel anytime

    Step 4: Run it, or take it and go

    Where continuity matters, we operate it. Where it does not, you own it outright and we are done.

    • Monitoring and an owner for the thing that breaks
    • A monthly care plan, only where a running system needs one
    • No lock-in: it runs without us either way

What step one returns: 10 free first steps.

Each is a document or a sample with a named input and a named output, not a discovery call in a different hat.

5 outcomes we agree to be judged on.

A working system in weeks, not a document
Measured on Time from first note to something in production use
The repeat work stops needing a person
Measured on Hours a week returned, and cost per processed item
Data that keeps arriving after launch
Measured on Feed uptime, freshness, and manual interventions per week
Founder-direct technical judgment
Measured on Rework, and decisions that do not need a second meeting
You own everything
Measured on Whether anything breaks when we walk away

Before you write

The questions that come up every time.

Something not covered here? Ask it in the form and it gets a straight answer from the person who would do the work.

What does a build cost?

Most first builds are fixed-price in the low thousands, delivered in one to three weeks. Larger builds (operational platforms, prototypes, client portals) run higher, and ongoing operating support is a separate monthly figure. Every price is built the same way: the hours the work takes, the tools it runs on, and a share of company cost. It is agreed before work starts and does not move. The pricing page shows the full arithmetic.

Why are your rates lower than a local hire?

Structure, not corner-cutting. We are a US company with a distributed team and no office, sales floor, or delivery-manager tier, so the overhead built into an hour is smaller. What does not change is the standard: work is reviewed, tested, and documented, it lands in your repository, and the engineer who scoped it is the one who builds it.

How is this different from hiring someone?

It is usually not either/or. A job posting is a list of tasks, and some of those tasks are rules rather than judgment; those are software. Automating them costs less than the first month of the salary and does not resign. The seat still gets filled; it just starts further along, doing the part that needs a person.

Do we have to commit to a retainer?

No. Send the bottleneck, take the one-page first move, and stop there if you want. A build is a build. Monthly support exists only where a running system needs an owner, and it can be cancelled.

Where to next

Send the bottleneck. Get a written answer.

A few sentences on what is still being done by hand is enough. We tell you whether to automate it, build around it, staff it, or leave it alone.

We reply within two business days. If it is a fit, you get a one-page note on what to do first, before any sales call.